Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Tarp Funds Bailout ... What Did It REALLY Do?

Tarp Funds Bailout ... What Did It REALLY Do?

The Government bailout of distressed banks via the TARP Funds (Troubled Asset Relief Fund) has been a very controversial issue since enacted. There are basically two groups of people regarding this issue: those for the TARP funds and those against. Let's examine these two groups and their thinking.

Group For TARP funds bailout: They believe this is necessary to prevent a recession or a deepened recession. They do not see it as government interference with free market. They do not see it as against the constitution. They believe this will give banks the liquidity and capital to free up credit so lending can be easier again and this can spur more borrowing and spending.

Group Against TARP funds bailout: This group believes that the U.S. is already in a recession and any government intervention will only delay, prolong and make for a deeper recession or perhaps depression. Many in this group see the government interference with free market capitalism against the constitution (not to mention quasi socialistic policy). This group of thinking also doubts that this injection/investment/spending (whatever term you prefer) in U.S. financial institutions will provide for easier credit for consumers. This group (well, at least I can speak for myself) agrees that without the bailout the economy would have suffered a far worse state, however this state is inevitable and will only be worsened by attempts to interfere with the free market.

Furthermore, what I don't think many people realize (even those that are for the TARP funds bailout), is that the failure of the large financial institutions that have been bailed out and/or merged with another firm would have caused a run on the banks and perhaps a collapse of the U.S. financial system as a whole. I know that sounds scary, but it is what it is.

What has happened so far:

Well, no matter which side of the issue you support we can only know which side is correct as it plays out. So far, credit has not loosened for consumers. Credit qualification has become more difficult. As far as real estate is concerned, the following changes have been noticed: Banks are less inclined to do loan modifications, they are approving less short sales as well as making them more difficult to approve. Banks are sitting on more real estate inventory. Why? Banks are now in a better financial position and are not as pressured to sell non-performing assets and cut loan modification deals as they were before. As for interest rates, they have dramatically increased . . . but we haven't seen anything yet.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

What In The World Are Interest Rates Doing?

What In The World Are Interest Rates Doing?
In the past two and a half days we have seen interest rates on the 30 year fixed go from 4.875% to 6.0%! What the heck just happened you ask? The last three days of interest rate hikes were nearly entirely due to a decrease in demand for treasure securities shown by the lackluster treasury auction.
Why would treasury demand decrease? For those who keep in touch with me, I'm sure you've already heard my rambling about China, the trade deficit and the U.S. Treasuries relationship. But here I go again anyway. As our trade deficit has exploded over the past decade from less than -$10 billion/month to over -$60 billion/month, China has been buying a significant amount of U.S. treasury securities to compensate for that. The more exporting they do to the U.S., the more treasuries they buy. The less they export to the U.S., the less treasuries they buy. Since the end of 2008 to now, the U.S. has stopped consuming as much as before due to the recession in the economy. In turn, China has stopped exporting as much, in fact about half as much. The U.S. trade deficit just went from over -$60 billion/month to less than -$30 billion/month. Literally cut in half! Is this a good thing for the economy? Yes, this is just what we need to bring the economy back to a stable operating level. Is this good for mortgage interest rates? NO! This is terrible for interest rates. Mortgage interest rates are directly influenced by treasury yields. As demand weakens for U.S. treasuries, yields will continue to go up. Bonds 101: Bond prices and interest rates have an inverse relationship. As bond prices increase, rate decreases and vice versa.
When will rates go down back to where they were? When demand for treasuries increases again or there is some external force to influence rates down again. In my Pessimistic, lonely little humble opinion, we likely just saw mortgage interest rate lows for quite some time two days ago.
visit: http://www.equityinmotion.net for local san diego and chula vista real estate and financing info.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Where Are Interest Rates Headed?

Where Are Interest Rates Headed?

It was just a couple of months ago when the Fed was talking about subsidizing interest rates to 4 - 4.5%. There hasn't been a mention of any such activity since. Instead, the Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, announced that the Fed would be purchasing U.S. Treasuries in large quantity in an effort to push interest rates even lower.
This bold move seems to be a wiser option than simply subsidizing interest rates on mortgages directly. This move aims to directly influence interest rates while also helping keep up demand for Treasuries and aiding the support of the dollar. Side effects? Well, if you subscribe to the crowd who believe there is a current bubble developing in bond prices this could definitely expand the bubble.
visit: http://www.equityinmotion.net for local san diego and chula vista real estate and financing info.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Obama Proposal to Reduce Mortgage Interest Deducibility

Obama Proposal to Reduce Mortgage Interest Deducibility

The Obama Administration has recommended, as part of its budget proposal, that the amount families earning more than $250,000 year can deduct for mortgage interest be reduced. We must ask ourselves what are the consequences of doing this? Logic would tell us that those with the deepest pockets would not be inclined to purchase real estate if the tax deduction was reduced or removed. This may affect the value of all property and further hinder recover of real estate prices for a long period of time.


visit: http://www.equityinmotion.net for local san diego and chula vista real estate and financing info.

Obama's Loan Modification Plan: 7 Things You Need to Know

Obama's Loan Modification Plan: 7 Things You Need to Know
At the heart of the President Barack Obama's ambitious plan to rescue the housing market is the conviction that restructuring distressed mortgages will keep struggling borrowers in their homes and help insert a floor beneath plummeting property values. With $75 billion dedicated to reworking troubled loans, that's a big bet—especially considering that a top banking regulator said last December that almost 53 percent of loans modified in the first quarter of 2008 went bad again within six months. But supporters argue that mortgage modifications need to be properly engineered to work—and many early ones weren't. To that end, the Obama administration on Wednesday unveiled fresh details on its plan to restructure at-risk loans and help as many as four million home owners avoid foreclosure. Here are seven things you need to know about Obama's loan modification program.
The plan centers on the belief that struggling borrowers will stay in their homes—even as values decline sharply—as long as they can make their monthly payments. Although not everyone agrees with this, billionaire investor Warren Buffett endorsed the philosophy in his most recent letter to shareholders. "Commentary about the current housing crisis often ignores the crucial fact that most foreclosures do not occur because a house is worth less than its mortgage (so-called “upside-down” loans)," Buffett wrote. "Rather, foreclosures take place because borrowers can’t pay the monthly payment that they agreed to pay."
2. Thirty-one percent: To that end, the administration's plan requires participating loan servicers to reduce monthly payments to no more than 38 percent of the borrower's gross monthly income. The government would then chip in to bring payments down further, to no more than 31 percent of the borrower's monthly income. In lowering the payment, the servicer would first reduce the interest rate to as low as 2 percent. If that's not enough to hit the 31 percent threshold, they would then extend the terms of the loan to up to 40 years. If that's still not enough, the servicer would forebear loan principal at no interest. The plan does not, however, require servicers to reduce mortgage principal, which Richard Green, the director of the Lusk Center for Real Estate at USC, considers a shortcoming. "For underwater loans, if you don't write down the balance to be less than the value of the house, people still have an incentive to default," Green says. "Writing down the principal first instead of last—which is what [the Obama administration is] proposing—makes sense to me."
3. Cash incentives: To encourage participation, servicers will be paid $1,000 for each modification and will get an additional $1,000 payout each year for as many as three years, as long as the borrower continues making payments. Borrowers, meanwhile, can get up to $1,000 knocked off the principal of their loan each year for as many as five years if they make their payments on time. Neither party can receive the cash incentives until the modified loan payments have been made for at least three months.
4. Financial hardship: The Obama administration is pitching its plan as an effort to help responsible homeowners ensnared in the historic housing slump and painful recession—not speculators. As such, only owner-occupied, primary residences with outstanding principal balances of up to $729,750 are eligible. Occupancy status will be verified through documents, such as the borrower's credit report. In addition, the program is designed to target homeowners who are undergoing "serious hardships"—such as a loss of income—which have put them at risk of default. To participate, borrowers will have to sign an affidavit of financial hardship and verify their income with documents. "If we would have had such stringent verification over the last four or five years, we probably wouldn't be in as bad a position as we are in," says Richard Moody, the chief economist at Mission Residential. But while Moody has no objection to such verification, obtaining documents from so many homeowners could be an onerous effort. "It's going to be a very time-consuming process," he says. Only loans originated on or before Jan. 1, 2009, are eligible, and modified payments will remain in place for five years. Now that the administration's plan is out, lenders are free to begin modifying loans.
5. Net present value: To determine if a particular mortgage will be modified, the servicer will perform a so-called net present value test. The test compares the expected cash flow that the loan would generate if it is modified with the expected cash flow it would generate if it isn't. If the modified loan is expected to produce more cash flow for the mortgage holder, the servicer is to restructure the loan. Howard Glaser, a mortgage industry consultant and a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development official during the Clinton administration, called this component of the plan "clever," arguing that it would work to ensure broad participation. "When you apply the formula, the loans that are modified are the ones that are in the best economic interest of the investors to modify," Glaser says. "The federal subsidy for the payment on the modification…tips the scale toward modification as a better deal for the investor."
6. Second liens

The Obama plan also addresses the issue of second liens—such as home equity loans or home equity lines of credit—by offering incentives to extinguish them. But key details on this component of the plan remained unclear. "Distinguishing the second lien is really important," Green says. "[But] exactly how they are going to convince the second lien holder to do this is not clear to me at all."
7. Will it work? Moody argues that while the plan may reduce foreclosures

for primary residences, it could lead to a spike in defaults for another group of homeowners. Although he supports the administration's efforts to focus the initiative on primary residences, Moody notes that "it could be the case that a lot of [real estate speculators] have been just hanging on waiting to see exactly what the details are of this [plan]," Moody says. Now that it's clear the Obama plan leaves speculators out, "we could actually see a spike in foreclosures or at least mortgage defaults among this group."
Glaser, meanwhile, worries that lenders may soon be overwhelmed by inquiries from homeowners looking to participate. "Starting today, millions of borrowers are going to start to call their lenders to see whether or not they are eligible," he said. "And I'm not sure that the financial services industry has the capacity to handle these inquiries."

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

How To Spark Home Buying Again

How To Spark Home Buying Again
Banks are being bailed out and more home loans are being modified, but what to do about home sales? What will spark people into home buying again? Especially with our foreclosure saturated city of Chula Vista in San Diego. A new plan has been announced to be in development to use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce mortgage rates for new home loans as far as 4.5%. it is not clear at this point how such a plan will be implemented. The government could perhaps buy down interest rates using TARP funds or they could perhaps just create a new temporary program through the two government controlled agencies FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC.

visit: http://www.equityinmotion.net for local san diego and chula vista real estate and financing info.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Herd Mentality

Herd Mentality

It is amazing how caught up in the herd people can get sometimes. A few start running in one direction and pretty soon it turns into a herd of hysteria. But what happens when a few people from the herd stop and turn around in the opposite direction? Just as when good old Forrest Gump stopped running, everyone suddenly becomes disoriented and confused. Some want to continue in the direction they were headed, but the overwhelming feeling of wanting to be a part of the group causes them to turn around and follow the herd.
There is always a herd running in some direction, whether it is the herd that proclaims the next dot com stock is going to go up in price forever, or the herd that is certain that the property they want to buy will double in value every year. Unfortunately, it is very difficult for most people to think outside of herd mentality. Now that the herd has stopped charging full speed ahead in the real estate market, many people are left standing disoriented and confused. Some people want to sell everything now with the same hysteria they had when they wanted to buy everything in sight. This has led to the drastic change in the real estate market, the rise in foreclosures, and a rise in the not so well known “short sales.”
It is much easier to get caught in the herd mentality than it is to go against the flow. This fact is part of what makes herds so important. The herd is predictable. You can count on a herd to move together in one giant mass. The herd is also dangerous. You can count on the herd to shake the ground as it moves. The herd has no direction except for the direction it is going. Sometimes the herd can get lost. The herd only moves because everyone in the herd is moving.
We must stay outside of the herd, always watching closely. When the herd begins to run out of steam, it might be wise to head in the opposite direction (even though the herd thinks you are nuts!).
Don’t forget to visit: http://www.equityinmotion.net